Advancing cyber diplomacy in the Asia Pacific: Japan and Australia/ Mark Bryan F. Manantan
Material type: TextPublication details: 2021Subject(s): Online resources: In: Australian Journal of International Affairs Vol.75 Issue 4, August 2021, pp. 432-459 (36)Summary: This article investigates the increasing prominence of deterrence in the practice of cyber diplomacy in the Asia Pacific. Using Japan and Australia as case studies, it argues that both states continue to adhere to the conceptual tenets of cyber diplomacy, however, in practice, there is a growing integration of deterrence-cyber capabilities and public attribution/naming and shaming-in the equation at varying degrees and intensities. The article endeavours to make two important contributions: First, revitalize the existing cyber diplomacy framework by challenging the extant literature's view of deterrence's limited application-underpinned by cold war analogies-and the implausibility of conducting attribution of cyberattacks. Secondly, evaluate Japan and Australia's cyber diplomacy based on empirical evidence.Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Article | Mindef Library & Info Centre Journals | CYBER SECURITY (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Not for loan | 66762.1001 |
Browsing Mindef Library & Info Centre shelves, Shelving location: Journals Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
CYBER SECURITY Hug a hacker/ | CYBER SECURITY Iran and its neighbors face risks and opportunities in cyber security/ | CYBER SECURITY Leadership in cyber security: who takes responsibility?/ | CYBER SECURITY Advancing cyber diplomacy in the Asia Pacific: Japan and Australia/ | CYBER SECURITY EW Europe: the challenges facing ground EW - a UK Perspective/ | CYBER SECURITY Toward intelligent cyber-physical systems: digital twin meets artificial intelligence/ | CYBER SECURITY Cyber campaigns and strategic outcomes/ |
This article investigates the increasing prominence of deterrence in the practice of cyber diplomacy in the Asia Pacific. Using Japan and Australia as case studies, it argues that both states continue to adhere to the conceptual tenets of cyber diplomacy, however, in practice, there is a growing integration of deterrence-cyber capabilities and public attribution/naming and shaming-in the equation at varying degrees and intensities. The article endeavours to make two important contributions: First, revitalize the existing cyber diplomacy framework by challenging the extant literature's view of deterrence's limited application-underpinned by cold war analogies-and the implausibility of conducting attribution of cyberattacks. Secondly, evaluate Japan and Australia's cyber diplomacy based on empirical evidence.
IT
There are no comments on this title.