000 | 01133cam a2200193 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
100 | 1 | _aGANGULY Sumit | |
700 | _aKRAIG Michael R | ||
245 |
_aThe 2001-2002 Indo-Pakistan crisis: _bexposing the limits of coercive diplomacy / _cby Sumit Ganguly and Michael R Kraig |
||
260 | _c2005 | ||
520 | _aUsing the example of the 2001-2002 crisis between India and Pakistan this article tests the presumption by political decision-makers that coercive diplomacy is a viable alternative to war. India tried but failed in its attempt to use forceful persuasion to end the crisis on terms favourable to itself despite being the stronger power in the dispute. This, it is said, exposes the limits of coercion in solving long standing territorial and ideological disputes and therefore calls into question its value as a method of diplomacy. | ||
650 | _aCOERCION | ||
650 | _aDIPLOMACY | ||
650 |
_aINDIA _xFOREIGN RELATIONS _xPAKISTAN |
||
650 |
_aINDIA _xFOREIGN POLICY _xPAKISTAN |
||
650 | _aTERRORISM | ||
690 | _aIndia | ||
773 |
_aSecurity Studies: _gVol 14 No 2, April-June 2005, pp.290-324 (118) |
||
945 |
_i19126-1001 _rY _sY |
||
999 |
_c5138 _d5138 |