000			01977nam a22002057a 4500
001			48105
003			OSt
005			20250610103354.0
008			250610b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aBUITELAAR Tom _eauthor
245			_aLeadership agency in UN peace operations / _cTom Buitelaar
260			_c2025
520			_aThere is a growing interest in the role of individual mission leaders in UN peace operations in peacekeeping studies. However, the concept of ‘agency’ has remained latent in much of this literature. This omission presents a risk of concept stretching and concept ambiguity as scholars continue to explore this topic. In this paper, I analyse the different ways in which the agency of mission leaders has been (implicitly) conceptualized thus far and argue that the existing literature pays insufficient attention to how the scope for individual agency can be context-dependent. Furthermore, I contend that mission leaders are too rarely seen as real human beings, with personalities, background experiences and values. I build on sociological and principal/agent-theories to develop the concept of ‘personal identity’ and then formulate a set of conditions under which the room for individual agency in UN peace operations is enhanced or reduced. Subsequently, I demonstrate the added value of this approach by conducting an illustrative case study of Patrick Cammaert’s tenure as Commander of MONUC’s Eastern Division between 2005-2007. The article shows that investigating the interaction between structure and real-world agents leads to a more holistic and sophisticated understanding of the behaviour of peacekeeping leadership.
650			_aPEACEKEEPING
650			_aLEADERSHIP
650			_aAGENCY
773			_gInternational Peacekeeping, Volume 32, Number 2, April 2025, pages: 228-256
856			_uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13533312.2024.2400104 _zClick here for full text
942			_2ddc _cARTICLE _n0
999			_c48105 _d48105