000 | 01428nam a22001937a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 48034 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20250521104837.0 | ||
008 | 250521b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
100 |
_aLAISHRAM Chinglen _eauthor |
||
245 |
_aRethinking national security: _bis it singular or multidimensional, and where does human well-being fit? / _cChinglen Laishram and Homen Thangjam |
||
260 | _c2024 | ||
520 | _aRealist approaches to national security have limitations as they focus mainly on protecting a State’s territorial integrity and against external and internal threats. Chandra and Bhonsle proposed a comprehensive national security framework considering six key domains. However, it remains unclear whether national security has ‘one’ or ‘many’ dimensions and whether human well-being is a component or an outcome of national security. This study found that using a three-dimensional index for national security improved cumulative data variance by 33 per cent, and treating human well-being as an outcome of national security resulted in a 30 per cent improvement in its predictive capacity. | ||
650 |
_aNATIONAL SECURITY _xWELL-BEING |
||
700 |
_aTHANGJAM Homen _eauthor |
||
773 | _gStrategic Analysis, Volume 48, Number 4, July-August 2024, pages: 326-345 | ||
856 |
_uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09700161.2024.2404619 _zClick here for full text |
||
942 |
_2ddc _cARTICLE _n0 |
||
999 |
_c48034 _d48034 |