000 | 01727nam a22002177a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 47988 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20250519152858.0 | ||
008 | 250519b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
100 |
_aDINCER Osman Bahadir _eAuthor |
||
245 |
_aThe Legacy of the Arab uprisings on Turkey's foreign policy: _bAnkara's regional power delusion/ _cOsman Bahadir Dinçer |
||
260 | _c2024 | ||
500 | _aIn the aftermath of the Arab upheavals, Turkey pursued an overambitious regional leadership agenda that appeared incompatible with its underlying capabilities. In retrospect, there was sufficient evidence in the wake of the Arab upheavals that Turkey’s power capacity did not match the assertive rhetoric used by Turkish ruling elites that the region should be remade in their image. However, Turkish foreign policy was not fine-tuned to the situation. On the contrary, Turkey increased the assertiveness of its tone. In the face of ample empirical evidence pointing to the unsustainability of Turkish leadership’s ambitions in the region, why did an overhaul not take place in its Middle East policies? Drawing from multiple qualitative data sources, this study argues that at least two factors explain this paradox: (i) overconfidence that led to glaze-over effects and (ii) the civilisational perspective of the ruling elite, which underestimated conventional international relations parameters. | ||
598 | _aForeign Policy, Turkish, | ||
650 | _aFOREIGN | ||
650 | _aARAB | ||
650 | _aCIVILISATION | ||
773 | _gCambridge Review of International Affairs, Number 2, Volume 37, 2024, page: 245-264 | ||
856 |
_uhttps://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2022.2145180 _zClick here for full text |
||
942 |
_2ddc _cJOURNAL _n0 |
||
999 |
_c47988 _d47988 |