000			02099nam a22002177a 4500
001			47986
003			OSt
005			20250519152031.0
008			250519b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aHSU Szu-Yun _eAuthor
245			_aPopulism in Taiwan: _bRethinking the Neo-liberalism-Populism Nexus/ _cSzu-Yun Hsu
260			_c2024
520			_aContemporary scholarship on populism, albeit involving divergent approaches and polarised diagnoses of populism’s political impacts, commonly attributes the recent populist surge to the peril of neo-liberal encroachment. However, such a neo-liberal–populist proposition encounters discrepant experiences when applied in non-Western contexts, including in East Asia. To recalibrate the conceptual framework, this article employs Gramsci-inspired scholarship on hegemony and populism – the notion of “the integral state” and non-reductionist class politics in particular – and utilises Taiwan as a case to expound upon the entanglement of democratisation, neo-liberalisation, and various forms of populist politics. Situating the post-2000 surge of multiple popular movements in Taiwan’s hegemonic restructuring since the 1980s, this article identifies a course of bifurcated development between “liberal populism of the bourgeois hegemony” and the “neo-liberal populism of the multitude” that embodies various ways in which neo-liberalism intersects with populist politics. Highlighting the constant boundary-redrawing of the integral state and its associated class politics along the hegemonic restructuring processes, Taiwan’s case exemplifies a critical approach to rethinking the over-determined relations between populism and neo-liberalism for other East Asian states and beyond.
598			_aPOPULISM, NEO-LIBERAL, POLITIC, MULTITUDE
650			_aPOPULISM
650			_aNEO-LIBERALISATION
650			_aMULTITUDE
773			_gJournal of Contemporary Asia, Number 3, Volume 54, 2024, Page 478-501
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2023.2174167 _zClick here for full text
942			_2ddc _cJOURNAL _n0
999			_c47986 _d47986