000			01997nam a22002177a 4500
001			47947
003			OSt
005			20250508161509.0
008			250508b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aPAHUJA Sundhya _eAuthor
245			_aNo future without history: _bThe future of international law/ _cSundhya Pahuja
260			_c2025
520			_aThe invitation to reflect upon the question ‘Toward a different IR?’ challenges those of us engaging from a legal background to ask what a different international law might look like. This necessarily involves taking stock of the historical foundations of our discipline and acknowledging the ways in which these foundations continue to shape its present form. This entails provincialising international law and approaching it as a site of struggle, rather than as a settled and neutral framework. By doing so, I argue, we can begin to envision a future for international law that is not merely an extension of its imperial past, but a departure from it. This reimagining of international law requires us to practice the discipline differently, to teach it differently, and to think about it differently. Only by doing so can we hope to create a future for international law that is more just, and maybe slightly less imperial. When we think about the future of our discipline—whether International Law or International Relations, let us remember that the future does not simply ‘arrive’ or unfold on its own. It is something that we, as international jurists, diplomats and scholars actively shape every day—and every tomorrow—through our practices, our teachings, and our commitments.
598			_aINTERNATIONAL LAW, CRISIS, TWAIL
650			_aHISTORIOGRAPHY
650			_aCRISIS
650			_aINTERNATIONAL LAW
773			_gAustralian Journal of International Affairs, Volume 79, Number 1, 2025, Page 79-85
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2024.2415118 _zClick here for full text
942			_2ddc _cJOURNAL _n0
999			_c47947 _d47947