000			01538nam a22002177a 4500
001			47846
003			OSt
005			20250106113045.0
008			250106b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aANGSTORM jan _eAuthor
245			_aUnpacking the varying strategic logics of total defence/ _cJan Angstrom and Kristin Ljungkvist
260			_c2024
520			_aWhat is the strategic logic of so-called ‘total defence’? At first glance, total defence may appear as one coherent strategic concept. Indeed, it was predominantly small, non-aligned states that pursued total defence during the Cold War. In this article, however, we demonstrate that depending on how ‘total war’ is understood, there are subsequently different strategic logics ingrained in total defence. We show this by developing a typology of different total defences; and by empirically illustrating variation in strategic logics over time through a historical analysis of the total defence(s) in Sweden. Recognising the inherent variation of total defence is important since it helps us to understand that hidden behind a nominal pursuit of a total defence strategy are multifaceted strategies.
598			_aTOTAL DEFENCE
650			_aTOTAL DEFENCE
650			_aSTRATEGIC LOGIC
700			_aLJUNGKVIST Kristin _eAuthor
773			_gThe Journal of Strategic Studies, Volume 47, Number 4, August 2024, pages: 498-522
856			_uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01402390.2023.2260958 _zClick here for full text
942			_2ddc _cARTICLE _n0
999			_c47846 _d47846