000 | 01271nam a22002297a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 47412 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20240823102442.0 | ||
008 | 240823b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
100 | _aHYUNJUNG Kin | ||
245 |
_aRevisiting health security governance: _bthe korean biosurveillance regime from biopolitics to biocitizenship/ _cHyunJung Kim |
||
520 | _aThe South Korean COVID-19 pandemic response implemented a new biosurveillance regime actively utilizing new information and communication technology (ICT) and digital tools, centered on the testing, tracing, and treating (3T) strategy. However, Western media was praising it as a new pandemic response model for democratic countries. This article's case study illustrates how the post-MERS digital biosurveillance in Korea serves as a new model of biocitizenship establishing governmental discipline by social compromise. | ||
598 | _aBIOPOLITICS, BIOCITIZENSHIP, HEALTH SECURITY, BIODEFENSE, BIOSURVEILLANCE, ICT, NEWARTICLS | ||
650 | _aBIOPOLITICS | ||
650 | _aBIOCITIZENSHIP | ||
650 | _aHEALTH SECURITY | ||
650 | _aBIODEFENSE | ||
650 | _aBIOSURVEILLANCE | ||
650 | _aICT | ||
773 | _gAsian Perspective, Volume 48, Number 2, Spring 2024, pg. 277-299 | ||
942 |
_2ddc _cARTICLE _n0 |
||
999 |
_c47412 _d47412 |