000			01705nam a22002057a 4500
001			47391
003			OSt
005			20240822112531.0
008			240822b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aBEAUMONT Paul David
245			_aReimagining NATO after Crimea: _bdefender of the rule-based order and truth?/ _cPaul David Beaumont, Julie Wilhelmsen and Kristian Lundby Gjerde
260			_c2024
520			_aRussia’s annexation of Crimea and war on Ukraine has led to upheaval in NATO’s discourse and practice. Taking a step back from the security debate, this article contends that the very process of responding to Russian aggression has led to the reimagining of NATO’s identity. While NATO tends to present change as continuity, this article’s mixed methods analysis illuminates how a trio of new and ambitious self-representations have risen to prominence within NATO’s post-Crimea discourse. NATO has anointed itself defender of the international rules-based order and purveyor of truth and facts amidst a world of disinformation, while pushing a resilience policy agenda that expands its authority into new domestic domains. Problematizing these shifts, the article warns that NATO’s new narrative ignores its own role in the problems it seeks to solve and thus risks undermining NATO efforts to rally global support for Ukraine.
650			_aNATO _xSECURITIZATION _zRUSSIA _zUKRAINE
700			_aWILHELMSEN Julie
700			_aGJERDE Kristian Lundby
773			_gContemporary Security Policy: Volume 45, Number 3, July 2024, pages: 396-425
856			_uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13523260.2024.2349393 _zClick here for full text
942			_2ddc _cARTICLE _n0
999			_c47391 _d47391