| 000 | 01180nam a22002057a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 47312 | ||
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20240717142630.0 | ||
| 008 | 240717b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 | _aSCHILLING Stefan | ||
| 245 |
_aVisualizing the ties that bind us: _ba cross-sectional thematic and visual analysis of cohesion across three british military formations/ _cStefan Schilling |
||
| 260 | _c2024 | ||
| 520 | _aMilitary unit cohesion has been associated with team performance, combat motivation, and positive mental health outcomes. Scholarship of military cohesion has been dominated by the Standard Model of Cohesion and the Task Cohesion Approach. Recent shifts in the character of conflict alongside a range of sociopolitical changes require these models to be reevaluated. This article aims to empirically compare these models using a deductive exploratory approach to assess their utility for present-day military formations | ||
| 598 | _aMILITARY, LEADERSHIP, ARMED FORCES | ||
| 650 | _aMILITARY | ||
| 650 | _aARMED FORCES | ||
| 650 | _aLEADERSHIP | ||
| 773 | _gArmed Forces & Society, Volume 50, Number 3, July 2024, pg. 628-655 | ||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cARTICLE _n0 |
||
| 999 |
_c47312 _d47312 |
||