000 | 01382nam a22001817a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 47188 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20240613090651.0 | ||
008 | 240613b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
100 | _aKOCH Lisa Langdon | ||
245 |
_aMilitary regimes and resistance to nuclear weapons development/ _cLisa Langdon Koch |
||
260 | _c2023 | ||
520 | _aFew military regimes have seriously pursued a nuclear weapons capability, and only Pakistan has succeeded. I argue that military regimes governing nonnuclear weapons states are likely to prefer to invest in conventional rather than nuclear forces, even in the presence of external security threats. I identify two domestic sources of nuclear proliferation behavior in military regimes: the resource distribution preferences of the military organization and the need to manage the domestic conflicts that threaten the regime’s political survival. I test this theory using case evidence from Egypt, Brazil, and Pakistan. This study suggests that while external conditions are certainly important, domestic factors also have a significant impact on state security behavior. | ||
650 | _aNUCLEAR WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT | ||
773 | _gSecurity Studies, Vol 32, Number 2, April-May 2023, page: 239-270. | ||
856 |
_uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09636412.2023.2197621 _zClick here for full text |
||
942 |
_2ddc _cARTICLE _n0 |
||
999 |
_c47188 _d47188 |