000			01447nam a22002057a 4500
001			47023
003			OSt
005			20240515130031.0
008			240515b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aHUNTER Cameron
245			_aWe’ll never have a model of an AI major-general: _bartificial intelligence, command decisions and kitsch visions of war/ _cby Cameron Hunter and Bleddyn E. Bowen
260			_c2024
520			_aMilitary AI optimists predict future AI assisting or making command decisions. We instead argue that, at a fundamental level, these predictions are dangerously wrong. The nature of war demands decisions based on abductive logic, whilst machine learning (or ‘narrow AI’) relies on inductive logic. The two forms of logic are not interchangeable, and therefore AI’s limited utility in command – both tactical and strategic – is not something that can be solved by more data or more computing power. Many defence and government leaders are therefore proceeding with a false view of the nature of AI and of war itself.
598			_aARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, STRATEGY, TACTICS, NEWARTICLS
650			_aARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE _xSTRATEGY _xTACTICS
700			_aBOWEN Bleddyn E.
773			_gThe Journal of Strategic Studies, Volume 47, Number 1, February 2024, page: 116-146
856			_uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01402390.2023.2241648 _zClick here for full text
942			_2ddc _cARTICLE _n0
999			_c47023 _d47023