000 | 01317nam a22001937a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 46963 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20240424141136.0 | ||
008 | 240424b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
100 | _aMILEVSKI Lukas | ||
245 |
_aWhat makes a good strategic concept?/ _cLukas Milevski |
||
260 | _c2023 | ||
520 | _aStrategic concepts are more than simply academic concepts but must also relate to strategic practice, which affects how we should gauge concept quality. Rather than purely academic measures, strategic concepts must also be judged according to their usefulness for practice. Yet the relationship between general theory and specific practice has hardly been explored, a task this article undertakes. Academic theory generates ad hoc concepts, which are used to build specific theories of victory, which are used to generate orders. The measures by which to judge a concept’s quality depends on where in this multi-phase transference process any concept is located. | ||
598 | _aSTRATEGIC CONCEPT, STRATEGIC PRACTICE, NEWARTICLS | ||
650 |
_aSTRATEGIC CONCEPT _xSTRATEGIC PRACTICE |
||
773 | _gComparative Strategy, Volume 42, Numbers 1-6, 2023, page: 718-728 | ||
856 |
_uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01495933.2023.2236493 _zClick here for full text |
||
942 |
_2ddc _cARTICLE _n0 |
||
999 |
_c46963 _d46963 |