000			01297nam a22001937a 4500
001			46961
003			OSt
005			20240424110840.0
008			240424b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aHENAKER Lars
245			_aDecision-making style and victory in battle: _bis there a relation?/ _cLars Henaker
260			_c2022
520			_aCan decision-making styles impact victory and defeat in armed conflicts? To answer the question of whether decision-making styles are linked to the victories and defeats of individual tacticians, this study utilizes five general decision-making styles: Rational, Intuitive, Dependent, Avoidant and Spontaneous. The aim of this study is to examine whether one or several of the general decision-making styles (GDMS) have an impact on tactical outcomes in wargames. A total of 104 officers and academics participated in the study. The study’s foremost conclusion is that the Dependent style is significantly connected to defeat in the wargame’s dueling set up.
598			_aDECISION-MAKING, NEWARTICLS
650			_aDECISION-MAKING
773			_gComparative Strategy, Volume 41, Numbers 1-6, 2022, page: 415-436
856			_uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01495933.2022.2087436 _zClick here for full text
942			_2ddc _cARTICLE _n0
999			_c46961 _d46961