000 | 01813nam a22002057a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 46937 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20240419143343.0 | ||
008 | 240419b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
100 | _aSHKLARSKY Ilan | ||
245 |
_aDriving innovation in air power: _bthe cold war’s four generations of fighter jets/ _cIlan Shklarsky and Eitan Shamir |
||
260 | _c2023 | ||
520 | _aThe aim of this article is to add an air power perspective to the innovation field, with emphasis on the development of jet fighters. Contemporary theory has not adequately addressed air power-related significant innovation, a shortcoming this article addresses. Using in-depth qualitive research methodology with eight diverse case-studies in the Cold War period, we show that innovation of jet fighters was typically initiated in response to hegemonic tensions, immediate threats and organsational factors such as civil–military relations, bureaucratic politics, and air force innovation culture. Moreover, through a comparative analysis we argue that significant and successful air power innovation is achieved through proficiency and knowledge gained by constant learning of air power theory and bottom-up innovation mechanisms. Looking forward, this study may be significant for assisting military professionals in making better-informed decisions about the use of fifth-generation air power by implementing past lessons learned into contemporary theory and future plans. | ||
598 | _aMILITARY INNOVATION, AIR POWER, NEWARTICLS | ||
650 |
_aMILITARY INNOVATION _xAIR POWER |
||
700 | _aSHAMIR Eitan | ||
773 | _gDefense & Security Analysis, Volume 39, Issue 2, 2023, page: 146-170 | ||
856 |
_uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14751798.2023.2178071 _zClick here for full text |
||
942 |
_2ddc _cARTICLE _n0 |
||
999 |
_c46937 _d46937 |