000			01418nam a22001937a 4500
001			46922
003			OSt
005			20240418113830.0
008			240418b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aRAUTA Vladimir
245			_aA conceptual critique of remote warfare/ _cVladimir Rauta
260			_c2021
520			_aThis paper presents a conceptual critique of “remote warfare.” It argues that “remote warfare” is more of a trendy term than a robust concept. In support of this assessment, this paper makes two arguments. First, that there is a lack of clarity in the debate over what “remote warfare” is: namely, the literature is yet to explain what it entails. Second, that because of this lack of definitional specificity, we also lack an account of its analytical value: what intellectual leverage does it hold over existing terms making similar claims? The article discusses these points by expanding on the notion of “semantic field,” which it uses to assess how “remote warfare” contributes and is shaped by the broader conceptual confusion in the study of contemporary war and warfare.
598			_aREMOTE WARFARE, NEWARTICLS
650			_aREMOTE WARFARE _xPOLITICAL WARFARE
773			_gDefence Studies, Volume 21, Issue 4, 2021, page: 545-572
856			_uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14702436.2021.1994398 _zClick here for full text
942			_2ddc _cARTICLE _n0
999			_c46922 _d46922