000 | 01316nam a22002297a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 46680 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20240203112035.0 | ||
008 | 240203b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
040 | _c0 | ||
100 | _aLUPOVICI Amir | ||
245 |
_aDeterrence by delivery of arms: _bNATO and the war in Ukraine/ _cAmir Lupovici |
||
260 | _c2023 | ||
520 | _aDuring the course of the war in Ukraine, various actors have employed a unique type of deterrence by denial: namely, the threat to deliver arms. NATO leaders have committed—through rhetoric and deeds—to continue to deliver weapons to Ukraine if Russia escalated the war in order to deny Russian success. Not only is this type of strategy undertheorized, but it also challenges the distinction between direct and extended deterrence that has been central to deterrence scholarship. In deterrence by delivery of arms, the patron deters not by threatening to fight or deploy forces, but by committing to send weapons. | ||
598 | _aNATO, UKRAINE, RUSSIA, NEWARTICLS | ||
650 | _aNATO | ||
650 | _aUKRAINE | ||
650 | _aRUSSIA | ||
773 | _gContemporary Security Policy, Vol 44, No 4, October 2023, page: 624-641 | ||
856 |
_uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13523260.2023.2256572 _zClick here for full text |
||
942 |
_2ddc _cARTICLE _n0 |
||
999 |
_c46680 _d46680 |