000			01477nam a22002417a 4500
001			46669
003			OSt
005			20240201161027.0
008			240201b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_c0
100			_aTI Ronald
245			_aLessons from the Russo-Ukrainian conflict: _bthe primacy of logistics over strategy/ _cRonald Ti and Christopher Kinsey
260			_a2023
520			_aA commonly held view amongst strategists is that strategy leads logistics, and that military logistics, which is the science of sustainment and replenishment, is generally subordinate. The authors of this article contend that in fact the opposite is often true, that logistics frequently has primacy over strategy, and that it is the success or failure of logistics at lower levels of war which exerts the greater effect. The authors illustrate their arguments on this nexus between logistics and strategy, with examples from the current Russo-Ukrainian conflict highlighting how Russian logistic failures have contributed to failure of the strategic plan.
598			_aRUSSO-UKRAINIAN WAR, MILITARY LOGISTICS, NEWARTICLS
650			_aRUSSO-UKRAINIAN WAR
650			_aMILITARY LOGISTICS
650			_aSTRATEGY _xSUSTAINMENT
700			_aKINSEY Christopher
773			_gDefence Studies, Vol 23, Number 3, September 2023, page: 381-398
856			_uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14702436.2023.2238613 _zClick here for full text
942			_2ddc _cARTICLE _n0
999			_c46669 _d46669