000			01631cam a2200157 4500
100	1		_aSTRATING Rebecca
245			_aThe rules-based order as rhetorical entrapment: _bcomparing maritime dispute resolution in the Indo-Pacific/ _c Rebecca Strating
260			_c2023
520			_aIn response to challenges to Asia's security order, regional powers such Australia, India, and Japan have adopted new "Indo-Pacific" strategic narratives to promote and defend the "rules-based order." These narratives use China's maritime disputes with smaller neighbors in the South China Sea as a key example of Beijing's revisionist intentions. Yet such narratives expose "rules-based order" advocates to risks of "rhetorical entrapment" as other actors compel them to abide by the standards they have set. To what extent have Indo-Pacific powers been forced to follow the rules in their own asymmetrical maritime disputes? This article examines three Indo-Pacific cases: Timor Sea Compulsory Conciliation between Australia and Timor-Leste, the Chagos Island Marine Protected Area Arbitration between the United Kingdom and Mauritius, and the Bay of Bengal Maritime Boundary Arbitration between India and Bangladesh. To varying degrees, this article finds that strategic narratives constrained the policy options of all three Indo-Pacific powers.
650			_aMARITIME DISPUTES
650			_aINDO-PACIFIC
773			_aContemporary Security Policy: _gVol 44, No 3, July 2023, pp372-409
598			_aMARITIME
856			_uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13523260.2023.2204266/ _zclick here for full text
945			_i70175-1001 _rY _sY
999			_c43245 _d43245