000			01410cam a2200193 4500
100	1		_aLARSEN Henrik
245			_aAfghanistan's significance for NATO Strategy/ _cHenrik Larsen
260			_c2022
520			_aNATO has reaffirmed crisis management as one of its 'core tasks', even as it strengthens collective defence amid Russia's invasion of Ukraine, and specifically refers to the need to learn from Afghanistan. Henrik Larsen argues that NATO needs to face the uncomfortable realities that can explain the failure of its most ambitious and deadliest operation in its history. Given that the Afghanistan experience makes a strong case against crisis management, he argues that NATO should refine its definition: 'crisis' synonymous with the prevention of inter-state conflict rather than diffuse threats such as global terrorism; and 'management' synonymous with over-the-horizon rather than open-ended operations or the supply of weapons like the case of Ukraine.
650			_aAFGHANISTAN
650			_aNATO
650			_aRUSSIA
650			_aUKRAINE
650			_aLEGITIMACY AND ETHNICITY _xTHE RACE AGAINST THE TALIBAN _xCLIENT-STATE ABUSE
773			_aRUSI Journal : _gVol.167 No.4/5, 2022 pp.40-49 (127)
598			_aAFGHAN, NATO, RUSSIA, UKRAINE, STRATEGY
856			_uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03071847.2022.2133741 _zClick here for full text
945			_i69450.1001 _rY _sY
999			_c42511 _d42511