000			01952cam a2200193 4500
100	1		_aHUYNH Tam-Sang
245			_aBolstering middle power standing: _bSouth Korea's response to U.S. Indo-Pacific strategy from Trump to Biden/ _cTam-Sang Huynh
260			_c2023
520			_aSouth Korea's reluctant response to the U.S. Free and Open Indo-Pacific (FOIP) strategy so far has failed to send a clear-cut signal to regional countries. Despite upholding multilateralism as the cornerstone of its middle power diplomacy, South Korea has not worked in line with Indo-Pacific second-size powers given Seoul's relatively vague response to the Indo-Pacific structure. With foreign policy shifts from Trump to Biden, South Korea may be well-positioned to communicate its policies with a more nuanced response to the Indo-Pacific. To leverage Seoul's middle power standing and its commitment to multilateralism, the Moon Jae-in administration can be expected to reflect on clearer definitions of what 'Indo-Pacific' means and come up with a more comprehensive understanding of multilateral cooperation in the region so as not to mistake 'Indo-Pacific' for its security connotation. As for South Korea, pursuing a three-headed strategy, for example, continuing to position itself in the Indo-Pacific region as a balancer, enhancing ties with like-minded middle powers, and deepening the South Korea-ASEAN relationship, could accommodate Seoul's interests and concerns amid the U.S.-China strategic competition and the COVID-19 pandemic.
650			_aCOVID-19
650			_aMIDDLE POWER
650			_aMULTILATERALISM
650			_aSOUTH KOREA
650			_aU.S. INDO-PACIFIC STRATEGY
773			_aThe Pacific Review : _gVol. 36, No 1, January 2023, pp. 32-60 (103)
598			_aCOVID-19, KOREA, INDO-PAC, USA, STRATEGY
856			_uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09512748.2021.1928737 _zClick here for full text
945			_i69441.1001 _rY _sY
999			_c42504 _d42504