000 | 01604cam a2200193 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
100 | 1 | _aBRAAT Eleni | |
245 |
_aThe construction of Secret Intelligence as a masculine profession/ _cEleni Braat |
||
260 | _c2022 | ||
520 | _aThe vast majority of intelligence history focuses on operations and executive decisionmaking rather than attending to, among other topics, analytical work or day-to-day organizational activities in the full (hierarchical) breadth of agencies. Especially in the studies on the Cold War period, one of the major implications of this research focus is that women, in so far as they are not part of top leadership or critical to operations, are excluded from analysis. This article argues that, during the Cold War period, security and intelligence services were constructed as a masculine profession. The article advances three professional standards that were constructed as masculine: a sense of responsibility, female support, and full-time availability. Empirically, this research focuses on the Dutch Security Service (in-depth interviews and archival research). | ||
650 | _aINTELLIGENCE | ||
650 | _aSCHOLARLY RELEVANCE | ||
650 | _aGENDER IDENTITIES AND PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS | ||
650 | _aHISTORICAL SOURCES | ||
650 | _aTHE WOMEN AND MEN IN THE SECURITY SERVICE | ||
773 |
_aInternational Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence: _gVol 35, No 4, Winter 2022-2023, pp. 694-712 (117) |
||
598 | _aINTEL, SECURITY | ||
856 |
_uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08850607.2022.2055429 _zClick here for full text |
||
945 |
_i69338.1001 _rY _sY |
||
999 |
_c42413 _d42413 |