000 | 01713cam a2200217 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
100 | 1 | _aCai Changkun | |
700 | _aJIANG Weiqi | ||
700 | _aTANG Na Tang | ||
245 |
_aCampaign-style crisis regime: _bhow China responded to the shock of COVID-19/ _cChangkun Cai,Weiqi Jiang & Na Tang |
||
260 | _c2022 | ||
520 | _aHow did China construct effective crisis governance systems to cope with a transboundary crisis like COVID-19? By integrating policy regime and campaign theories, this article constructs an analytical framework - the campaign-style crisis governance regime - to answer this question. The COVID-19 crisis was reconceived as a people's war in order to prompt idea-sharing within the regime. The decision-making and coordination capacity of crisis management was enhanced by the establishment of top-down leading groups/headquarters and complex horizontal/vertical and formal/informal institutional arrangements. By aligning the interests of stakeholders through a variety of mechanisms, the supply of materials and human resources and the level of cooperation were significantly improved. China's campaign-style crisis regime is embedded in the nation's political-administrative structures. This article also discusses the theoretical and empirical implications of Chinese-style response in the end. | ||
650 | _aPOLICY REGIME | ||
650 | _aCAMPAIGN-STYLE CRISIS REGIME | ||
650 | _aCRISIS GOVERNANCE | ||
650 | _aCOVID-19 | ||
650 | _aCHINA | ||
773 |
_aPolicy Studies : _gVol 43, No. 3, May 2022, pp.599-619 |
||
598 | _aPOLICY, COVID-19, CHINA | ||
856 |
_uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01442872.2021.1883576 _zClick here for full text |
||
945 |
_i69226.1001 _rY _sY |
||
999 |
_c42309 _d42309 |