| 000 | 01503cam a2200193 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 100 | 1 | _aBITZINGER Richard A. | |
| 245 |
_aMilitary-technological innovation in small states: _bthe cases of Israel and Singapore/ _cRichard A. Bitzinger |
||
| 260 | _c2021 | ||
| 520 | _aBoth Israel and Singapore engage in military-technological innovation in areas deemed critical to strategic sovereignty. Both countries have consistently championed high levels of funding for military R&D and for maintaining and nurturing indigenous defense industries. Both countries have, to a varying degree, also strongly supported the cultivation of local S&T, including the spin-on of commercial high-technology breakthroughs into the defense sector. Israel has been more successful when it comes to military-technological innovation, mostly because it has to: its strategic situation is much more tenuous than Singapore's. Singapore, on the other hand, faces much less of an existential threat, and so its military-technological innovation activities are more one of desire than necessity. | ||
| 650 | _aINNOVATION | ||
| 650 |
_aMILITARY _xTECHNOLOGY |
||
| 650 |
_aARMED FORCES _xDEFENSE INDUSTRIES |
||
| 650 | _aISRAEL | ||
| 650 | _aSINGAPORE | ||
| 773 |
_aThe Journal of Strategic Studies : _gVol 44 No.6, December 2021, pp. 873-900 (98) |
||
| 598 | _aMILITARY, TECHNOLOGY, ISRAEL, SING | ||
| 856 |
_uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01402390.2021.1947252 _zClick here for full text |
||
| 945 |
_i69014.1001 _rY _sY |
||
| 999 |
_c42110 _d42110 |
||