000 | 01481cam a2200205 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
100 | 1 | _aGHOLZ Eugene | |
700 | _aSAPOLSKY Harvey M. | ||
245 |
_aThe defense innovation machine: _bwhy the U.S. will remain on the cutting edge/ _cEugene Gholz & Harvey M. Sapolsky |
||
260 | _c2021 | ||
520 | _aAmerican security policy discussions commonly warn that the United States is falling behind technologically, especially vis-à-vis China. However, the U.S. military remains at the cutting edge because of its well-developed defense innovation system. No nation (or combination) comes close to U.S. investment in defense R&D. Unmatched political concerns about avoiding casualties, inherent rivalry among participants in the U.S. defense innovation system, and traditional American openness to immigration and new ideas drive the investment. The overly alarmist warnings come from a thriving threat assessment system that continually searches for potential military dangers and technological challenges. The warnings feed the defense innovation system. | ||
650 | _aDEFENSE INNOVATION | ||
650 | _aUNITED STATES | ||
650 | _aMILITARY | ||
650 | _aCHINA | ||
650 | _aR&D | ||
773 |
_aThe Journal of Strategic Studies : _gVol 44 No.6, December 2021, pp. 854-872 (98) |
||
598 | _aUSA, MILITARY, CHINA | ||
856 |
_uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01402390.2021.1917392?scroll=top&needAccess=true&role=tab _zClick here for full text |
||
945 |
_i69013.1001 _rY _sY |
||
999 |
_c42109 _d42109 |