000 | 01340cam a2200181 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
100 | 1 | _aFRAVEL M. Taylor | |
700 | _aGLASER Charles L. | ||
245 |
_aHow much risk should the United States run in the South China Sea?/ _cM. Taylor Fravel and Charles L. Glaser |
||
260 | _c2022 | ||
520 | _aHow strenuously, and at what risk, should the United States resist China's efforts to dominate the South China Sea? An identification of three options along a continuum-from increased resistance to China's assertive policies on one end to a partial South China Sea retrenchment on the other, with current U.S. policy in the middle-captures the choices facing the United States. An analysis of China's claims and behavior in the South China Sea and of the threat that China poses to U.S. interests concludes that the United States' best option is to maintain its current level of resistance to China's efforts to dominate the South China Sea. China has been cautious in pursuing its goals, which makes the risks of current policy acceptable. | ||
650 | _aSOUTH CHINA SEA | ||
650 |
_aUNITED STATES OF AMERICA _xUSA |
||
650 | _aCLAIM | ||
773 |
_aInternational Security : _gVol 47, No 2, Fall 2022, pp.88-134 (68) |
||
598 | _aSCSEA | ||
856 |
_uhttps://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00443 _zClick here for full text |
||
945 |
_i68994.1001 _rY _sY |
||
999 |
_c42087 _d42087 |