000 02164cam a2200193 4500
100 1 _aDEACON Chris
245 _a(Re)producing the 'history problem':
_bmemory, identity and the Japan-South Korea trade dispute/
_cChris Deacon
260 _a2022
520 _aJapan-South Korea relations have consistently been presented by International Relations scholars as a puzzle that confounds mainstream rationalist theories, which struggle to explain the consistent acrimony associated with the so-called 'history problem'. While many scholars have, therefore, adopted conventional constructivist approaches to incorporate history into their analyses, such literature often neglects the processes of (re)construction of this social reality, thereby implicitly treating these negative sentiments as essentialised elements of Korean and Japanese culture/identity which cause certain foreign policies. Using the recent Japan-South Korea trade dispute as a case study, this article instead draws on critical constructivist/poststructuralist theory and discourse analytical methods to examine how the 'history problem' is produced and reproduced. It argues that dominant discourses of remembering in South Korea, which represent Japan as an unrepentant colonial aggressor, and of forgetting in Japan, which represent South Korea as emotional and irrational for dwelling on the past, act to (re)produce identities that clash in their attitudes to difficult history. While such foreign policy practices (re)produce dominant national identities, these identities also shape the bounds of which foreign policies are legitimate or imaginable. This mutually constitutive relationship between identity and foreign policy continually reproduces the 'history problem' in Japan-South Korea relations.
650 _aJAPAN
650 _aSOUTH KOREA
650 _aHISTORY PROBLEM
650 _aMEMORY
650 _aIDENTITY, DISCOURSE
773 _aThe Pacific Review :
_gVol. 35, No 5, September 2022, pp. 789-820 (103)
598 _aJAPAN, KOREA
856 _uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09512748.2021.1897652
_zClick here for full text
945 _i67842.1001
_rY
_sY
999 _c41830
_d41830