000			01463cam a2200181 4500
100	1		_aBUSCH Per-Olof
700			_aHEINZEL Mirko
700			_aKEMPKEN Mathies
700			_aLIESE Andrea
245			_aMind the gap? _bcomparing de facto and de jure expert authority of International Public Administrations in financial and agricultural policy/ _cPer-Olof Busch, Mirko Heinzel, Mathies Kempken & Andrea Liese
260			_c2022
520			_aMany authors have argued that International Public Administration can influence policy-making through their expert authority. The article compares de jure and de facto expert authority of IPAs to evaluate their conformity. It comparatively assesses the two kinds of authority for five important IPAs (BIS, FAO, IMF, OECD and World Bank) active in agriculture or financial policy. It shows that, on average, de jure and de facto authority seem to conform. At the same time, it demonstrates that gaps between de jure and de facto authority exist at the level of the IPAs, the policy areas and the IPAs' addressees.
650			_aINTERNATIONAL PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION _xCOMPARATIVE _xEXPERT AUTHORITY _xDE JURE AUTHORITY _xDE FACTO AUTHORITY _xINTERNATIONAL ORGANISATIONS
773			_aJournal of Comparative Policy analysis : _gVol.24, No 3, June 2022, pp.230-253 (15A)
598			_aPOLICY
856			_uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13876988.2020.1820866 _zClick here for full text
945			_i67455.1001 _rY _sY
999			_c41509 _d41509