000 | 01812cam a2200157 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
100 | 1 | _aINSISA Aurelio | |
700 | _aPUGLIESE Giulio | ||
245 |
_aThe free and open Indo-Pacific versus the belt and road: _bspheres of influence and Sino-Japanese relations/ _cAurelio Insisa & Giulio Pugliese |
||
260 | _c2022 | ||
520 | _aRecent scholarship suggests that the thawing of diplomatic relations between China and Japan has caused a readjustment of Beijing's Belt and Road Initiative and Tokyo's Free and Open Indo-Pacific Vision towards an emerging complementarity. Through careful process-tracking, elite interviews, and analysis of Chinese and Japanese primary sources, this article instead demonstrates how, outside of the East Asian spotlight, Sino-Japanese geo-economic competition continues in South Asia and the Mekong subregion, fueled by power politics and a mutual distrust of each other's initiatives. On the basis of this evidence, this article qualifies Sino-Japanese interactions as a quest and denial for spheres of influence, whereas the Japanese government aims at denying Chinese spheres of influence. In doing so, this article highlights how Japanese proactivism from Sri Lanka to Thailand, via infrastructure and government financing, has become a driver of growing non-traditional security cooperation with India, the U.S., and Australia. | ||
650 |
_aBELT AND ROAD INITIATIVE _xECONOMIC STATECRAFT _xFREE AND OPEN INDO-PACIFIC _zJAPAN-CHINA _zMEKONG _xQUAD _xSPHERES OF INFLUENCE _zSRI LANKA |
||
773 |
_aThe Pacific Review : _gVol. 35, No 3, May 2022, pp. 557-585 (103) |
||
598 | _aSASIA, JAPAN, CHINA, ECONOMICS, POLITICS, POLICY, EASTASIA, ASIAN, INDO-PAC | ||
856 |
_uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09512748.2020.1862899 _zClick here for full text |
||
945 |
_i67452-1001 _rY _sY |
||
999 |
_c41506 _d41506 |