000 | 01158cam a2200133 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
100 | 1 | _aFOX Amos | |
245 |
_aOn Sieges/ _cAmos Fox |
||
260 | _c2021 | ||
520 | _aSieges, while not as flashy as hybrid warfare or grey-zone conflict, nor as trendy as disruptive technology and its associated concepts, command a central position in the wars of the post-Cold War era. Furthermore, despite being commonly associated with the tactical and operational level of conflict, sieges are often strategic and decisive affairs, as the siege of the US Embassy in Baghdad in December 2019 clearly demonstrated. Sieges bring a degree of decisiveness back to the battlefield, and those of the Russo-Ukrainian War (2014-present) bring this point to bear. In this article, Amos Fox suggests that policymakers, strategists and practitioners must understand how sieges operate and where they fit within war. | ||
650 |
_aSECURITY _xURBAN SIEGE _xURBAN DEFENCE _xCONFLICT _xCOLD WAR |
||
773 |
_aRUSI Journal : _gVol.166 No.2, 2021 pp.18-28 (127) |
||
856 |
_uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03071847.2021.1924077 _zClick here for full text |
||
945 |
_i66604.1001 _rY _sY |
||
999 |
_c40748 _d40748 |