| 000 | 01153cam a2200181 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 100 | 1 | _aWIEGAND Krista E. | |
| 700 | _aBEUCK Erik | ||
| 245 |
_aStrategic selection: _bPhilippine arbitration in the South China Sea dispute/ _cKrista E. Wiegand & Erik Beuck |
||
| 260 | _c2020 | ||
| 520 | _aIn this article, we theorize that the Philippine government chose to pursue arbitration against China for three strategic reasons: 1) to counterbalance China's military actions in the South China Sea, 2) because of the strong benefits to the state resulting from using arbitration, and 3) the probability of winning the case using arbitration was perceived by the Philippines as strong. To test our hypotheses, we use interviews and process tracing, through which we find evidence for our suppositions, primarily the last hypothesis. | ||
| 650 |
_aPHILIPPINE _xCHINA |
||
| 650 | _aPHILIPPINE STRATEGY | ||
| 650 | _aMILITARY IMBALANCE | ||
| 773 |
_aAsian Security: _gVol 16, No. 2, 2020, pp. 141-156 (21A) |
||
| 598 | _aPINES | ||
| 856 |
_uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14799855.2018.1540468 _zClick here for full text |
||
| 945 |
_i66504.1001 _rY _sY |
||
| 999 |
_c40656 _d40656 |
||