000 | 01017cam a2200157 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
100 | 1 | _aOLEJNICZAK Karol | |
245 |
_aComparing behavioral assumptions of policy tools: framework for policy designers/ _cKarol Olejniczak |
||
260 | _c2020 | ||
520 | _aIdentifying problems that obstruct compliance, and choosing a tool with a distinctive change mechanism. Based on this discussion, a spectrum of six generic policy tools have been provided and illustrated with examples: (1) equipping policy subjects to perform behavior, (2) banning misbehavior, (3) dis/incentivizing addressees to behave in a certain way, (4) informing to raise the awareness about need for compliance, (5) boosting, and (6) nudging towards desired behavior. | ||
650 | _aPOLICY TOOLS | ||
650 | _aBEHAVIOUR | ||
650 | _aPOLICY INSTRUMENTS | ||
773 | _aJournal of Comparative Policy analysis : Vol.22, No 6, December 2020, pp.498-520 | ||
856 |
_uhttps://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2020.1808465 _z click for text |
||
945 |
_i65733-1001 _rY _sY |
||
999 |
_c39933 _d39933 |