000			01364cam a2200157 4500
100	1		_aSTAVRIANAKIS Anna
245			_aControlling weapons circulation in a postcolonial militarised world/ _cAnna Stavrianakis
260			_c2019
520			_aTaking the tensions between arms transfer control and militarism as a starting point, it is argued that the negotiating process and eventual treaty text demonstrate competing modes of militarism. Expressed in terms of sovereignty, political economy, or human security, all three modes are underpinned by ongoing imperial relations: racial, gendered, and classed relations of asymmetry and hierarchy that persist despite formal sovereign equality. This means human security is a form of militarism rather than the antithesis of it. The argument reframes the challenges for controlling weapons circulation, placing the necessity for feminist, postcolonial anti-militarist critique front and centre.
650			_aARMS CONTROL
650			_aMILITARY
650			_aARMS TRADE
773			_aReview of International Studies: _gVol 45, Issue 1, January 2019, pp.57-76 (45)
856			_uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/review-of-international-studies/article/controlling-weapons-circulation-in-a-postcolonial-militarised-world/D38DCEA6562E2246FC1361060EF7E2ED _zClick link for online access
945			_i64927.1001 _rY _sY
999			_c39168 _d39168