000 | 00969cam a2200157 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
100 | 1 | _aKING Anthony C. | |
245 |
_aMission command 2.0: _bfrom an individualist to a collectivist model/ _cAnthony C. King |
||
260 | _c2018 | ||
520 | _aThis article specifies the distinctive character of mission command in the twenty-first century by examining the general ships of Stanley McChrystal and James Mattis. These examples contrast the historical attention to immediate tactical tasks with today's application, which involves a deep and enduring interdependence between commanders across echelons so that decisions are closely aligned. | ||
650 | _aMILITARY | ||
650 | _aMISSION COMMAND | ||
650 | _aUNITED STATES | ||
773 |
_aThe US Army War College Quarterly Parameters: _gVol. 47, No.1, Spring 2017, pp.7-19 (83) |
||
856 |
_uhttps://ssi.armywarcollege.edu/pubs/parameters/Issues/Spring_2017/Vol47No1.pdf _zClick here to access online |
||
945 |
_i61056-1001 _rY _sY |
||
999 |
_c36336 _d36336 |