000 | 01386cam a2200157 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
100 | 1 | _aKING Elisabeth | |
100 | 1 | _aMUTTER John C. | |
245 |
_aViolent conflicts and natural disasters: _b the growing case for cross-disciplinary dialogue/ _c John C. Mutter |
||
260 | _c2014 | ||
520 | _aComparisons between disasters and violent conflicts are often noted by political figures and in the news media, and those responding to conflicts and disasters witness similiarities on the ground. In contrast, the academic fields studying violent conflicts and so-called natural disasters have developed separately and practitioners usually separate the two phenomena as soon as the emergency response is over. This article, based on interviews with practitioners and a review of scholarly literature, makes a case for increased cross-disciplinary dialogue. We identify common consequences, responses and even causes of conflicts and disasters. We argue that more and better partnerships between those who work on conflicts and those who work on disasters can lead to advances in understanding and responding to conflicts and disasters. | ||
650 | _aNATURAL DISASTER | ||
650 | _aVIOLENT CONFLICT | ||
773 |
_aThird World Quarterly: _g Vol 35 No 7, 2014, pp.1239-1255 (101) |
||
856 |
_uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2014.926113 _z Click here for full text |
||
945 |
_i44623-1001 _rY _sY |
||
999 |
_c29220 _d29220 |