000			01513cam a2200145 4500
100	1		_aBARKAWI Tarak
245			_aOf camps and critiques: _ba reply to 'security, war, violence'
260			_c2012
520			_aIn this article, the author analysed on two aspects of concerns: 1) traditional security studies, and 2) the wider agenda - the idea that anything can be 'securitised'. The author argues that in International Relations (IR), the study of war was largely a casualty of the debate between these two aspects. Traditional security studies dealt with strategy not war, while the wider agenda was concerned with the logic of security itself. As a consequence, a discipline that imagines itself as centrally concerned with questions of war and peace does not in fact study war, part of a larger elision of war in the Enlightenment organisation of social and political inquiry. The author outlines the astounding absence of the Second World War in IR scholarship and then map out some ways in which the critical study of war leads one to think differently about the 'international' as a distinct space for inquiry. He seek to outline a 'critical war studies' for IR to frame and enable a new direction for research.
650			_aINTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORY _xCRITICAL SECURITY STUDIES
650			_aVIOLENCE _xWAR
773			_aMillennium: _gVol. 41 No. 1 2012, pp.124-130 (39)
856			_uhttp://mil.sagepub.com/content/41/1/124.full.pdf+html _zClick here to go to the website
945			_i38913-1001 _rY _sY
999			_c23777 _d23777