Why joint development agreements fail: implications for the South China Sea dispute/ Song Xue

By: Material type: TextTextPublication details: 2019Subject(s): In: Contemporary Southeast Asia Vol. 41, No. 3, December 2019, pp.418-446 (19)Summary: This article discusses the conditions leading to the implementation failures of joint development agreements; the deterioration of bilateral relations, often arising from the maritime boundary dispute that the joint development agreement was supposed to resolve. The finding provides policy implications for the current boundary disputes in the South China Sea: improved bilateral relations is the prerequisite for the effective implementation of joint development ventures, and not the other way around. Littoral states should also not pursue joint development agreements as a false pretext to secretly consolidate their maritime boundary claims, or to confirm the status of a "dispute". Furthermore, successful negotiations for a Code of Conduct for the South China Sea may help to create a conducive atmosphere for claimant states to agree on the joint development of offshore hydrocarbon resources.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode
Journal Article Mindef Library & Info Centre Journals MARITME (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Not for loan 64781.1001

This article discusses the conditions leading to the implementation failures of joint development agreements; the deterioration of bilateral relations, often arising from the maritime boundary dispute that the joint development agreement was supposed to resolve. The finding provides policy implications for the current boundary disputes in the South China Sea: improved bilateral relations is the prerequisite for the effective implementation of joint development ventures, and not the other way around. Littoral states should also not pursue joint development agreements as a false pretext to secretly consolidate their maritime boundary claims, or to confirm the status of a "dispute". Furthermore, successful negotiations for a Code of Conduct for the South China Sea may help to create a conducive atmosphere for claimant states to agree on the joint development of offshore hydrocarbon resources.

SCSEA

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.