Mind the gap? comparing de facto and de jure expert authority of International Public Administrations in financial and agricultural policy/ Per-Olof Busch, Mirko Heinzel, Mathies Kempken & Andrea Liese
Material type:
TextPublication details: 2022Subject(s): Online resources:
In:
Journal of Comparative Policy analysis Vol.24, No 3, June 2022, pp.230-253 (15A)Summary: Many authors have argued that International Public Administration can influence policy-making through their expert authority. The article compares de jure and de facto expert authority of IPAs to evaluate their conformity. It comparatively assesses the two kinds of authority for five important IPAs (BIS, FAO, IMF, OECD and World Bank) active in agriculture or financial policy. It shows that, on average, de jure and de facto authority seem to conform. At the same time, it demonstrates that gaps between de jure and de facto authority exist at the level of the IPAs, the policy areas and the IPAs' addressees.
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal Article | Mindef Library & Info Centre Journals | POLICY (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Not for loan | 67455.1001 |
Many authors have argued that International Public Administration can influence policy-making through their expert authority. The article compares de jure and de facto expert authority of IPAs to evaluate their conformity. It comparatively assesses the two kinds of authority for five important IPAs (BIS, FAO, IMF, OECD and World Bank) active in agriculture or financial policy. It shows that, on average, de jure and de facto authority seem to conform. At the same time, it demonstrates that gaps between de jure and de facto authority exist at the level of the IPAs, the policy areas and the IPAs' addressees.
POLICY
There are no comments on this title.