Image from Google Jackets

Academic-practitioner divide in intelligence studies / edited by Ruben Arcos, Nicole K. Drumhiller and Mark Phythian

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextSeries: Security and Professional Intelligence Education Series (SPIES)Publication details: Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2022Description: xii, 318 pages: illustrations; 23 cmISBN:
  • 9781538196175 (pbk.)
Subject(s): DDC classification:
  • 327.12 ARC
Summary: To a significant extent both the profession of intelligence and those delivering intelligence education share a common aim of developing intelligence as a discipline. However, this shared interest must also navigate the existence of an academic-practitioner divide. Such a divide is far from unique to intelligence - it exists in various forms across most professions - but it is distinctive in the field of intelligence because of the centrality of secrecy to the profession of intelligence and the way in which this constitutes a barrier to understanding and openly teaching about aspects of intelligence. How can co-operation in developing the profession and academic study be maximized when faced with this divide? How can and should this divide be navigated? The Academic-Practitioner Divide in Intelligence provides a range of international approaches to, and perspectives on, these crucial questions.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode
Book Mindef Library & Info Centre Exhibition Zone @ Main 327.12 ARC (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 80217-1001

Includes bibliograpical references and index.

To a significant extent both the profession of intelligence and those delivering intelligence education share a common aim of developing intelligence as a discipline. However, this shared interest must also navigate the existence of an academic-practitioner divide. Such a divide is far from unique to intelligence - it exists in various forms across most professions - but it is distinctive in the field of intelligence because of the centrality of secrecy to the profession of intelligence and the way in which this constitutes a barrier to understanding and openly teaching about aspects of intelligence. How can co-operation in developing the profession and academic study be maximized when faced with this divide? How can and should this divide be navigated? The Academic-Practitioner Divide in Intelligence provides a range of international approaches to, and perspectives on, these crucial questions.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.