Academic-practitioner divide in intelligence studies / edited by Ruben Arcos, Nicole K. Drumhiller and Mark Phythian
Material type:![Text](/opac-tmpl/lib/famfamfam/BK.png)
- 9781538196175 (pbk.)
- 327.12 ARC
Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Book | Mindef Library & Info Centre Exhibition Zone @ Main | 327.12 ARC (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 80217-1001 |
Includes bibliograpical references and index.
To a significant extent both the profession of intelligence and those delivering intelligence education share a common aim of developing intelligence as a discipline. However, this shared interest must also navigate the existence of an academic-practitioner divide. Such a divide is far from unique to intelligence - it exists in various forms across most professions - but it is distinctive in the field of intelligence because of the centrality of secrecy to the profession of intelligence and the way in which this constitutes a barrier to understanding and openly teaching about aspects of intelligence. How can co-operation in developing the profession and academic study be maximized when faced with this divide? How can and should this divide be navigated? The Academic-Practitioner Divide in Intelligence provides a range of international approaches to, and perspectives on, these crucial questions.
There are no comments on this title.