Why hawks win / Daniel Kahneman, Jonathan Renshon
Material type: TextPublication details: 2007Subject(s): In: Foreign Policy January-February 2007, pp.34-38 (66)Summary: Recent work by psychologists suggests that the human mind is predisposed to favour aggressive (hawk) solutions to problems rather than negotiated (dove) ones for example involving concessions. This article looks at the implications of this research in politics and conflict.Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Article | Mindef Library & Info Centre Journals | POLITICS (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Not for loan | 21408-1001 |
Recent work by psychologists suggests that the human mind is predisposed to favour aggressive (hawk) solutions to problems rather than negotiated (dove) ones for example involving concessions. This article looks at the implications of this research in politics and conflict.
There are no comments on this title.
Log in to your account to post a comment.