Strategies for managing rogue states Colin Dueck
Material type:
TextPublication details: 2006Subject(s):
In:
Orbis Vol 50 No 2, Spring 2006, pp.223-241 (44)Summary: Identifies the policy choices available to deal with rogue states as: appeasement, engagement, containment, rollback, and non-entanglement. Each has associated risks and advantages. This article considers how these options would apply to U.S. policy towards Iraq, North korea, and Iran, and concludes that containment is the most promising, while rollback and appeasement are the riskiest.
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal Article | Mindef Library & Info Centre Journals | XX(19837.1) (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Not for loan | 19837-1001 |
Identifies the policy choices available to deal with rogue states as: appeasement, engagement, containment, rollback, and non-entanglement. Each has associated risks and advantages. This article considers how these options would apply to U.S. policy towards Iraq, North korea, and Iran, and concludes that containment is the most promising, while rollback and appeasement are the riskiest.
There are no comments on this title.
Log in to your account to post a comment.