How does it stack up?: the anti-personnel mine ban convention at 10 / Peter Herby and Eve La Haye
Material type:
TextPublication details: 2007Subject(s):
In:
Arms Control Today Vol 37 No 10, December 2007, pp.6-10 (5)Summary: Considers progress since the Ottawa Convention was opened for signatures on 3rd December 1997. There are now 156 states-parties and the Convention is considered "one of the most successful multilateral arms treaties of recent years". Significant non-signatories are the USA, China, Russia, India, Pakistan, Burma, and Singapore but many of these prohibit export and the USA did not use a-p mines in Kosovo, Afghanistan or Iraq. While much remains to be done the track record so far is very encouraging.
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal Article | Mindef Library & Info Centre Journals | ARMS CONTROL (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Not for loan | 23347-1001 |
Browsing Mindef Library & Info Centre shelves, Shelving location: Journals Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Considers progress since the Ottawa Convention was opened for signatures on 3rd December 1997. There are now 156 states-parties and the Convention is considered "one of the most successful multilateral arms treaties of recent years". Significant non-signatories are the USA, China, Russia, India, Pakistan, Burma, and Singapore but many of these prohibit export and the USA did not use a-p mines in Kosovo, Afghanistan or Iraq. While much remains to be done the track record so far is very encouraging.
There are no comments on this title.
Log in to your account to post a comment.