Deterrence, blackmail, friendly persuasion / Edward Ifft
Material type:
TextPublication details: 2007Subject(s):
In:
Defense and Security Analysis Vol 23 No 3, September 2007, pp.237-256 (94)Summary: Considers the concept of deterrence (which has its roots in the Latin verb deterrere meaning to frighten) with particular reference to nuclear weapons. Looks at such matters as who can have nuclear weapons, the risks posed by rogue states, minimising the risk, and the possibility of developing some form of collective deterrence.
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal Article | Mindef Library & Info Centre Journals | NUCLEAR WEAPONS (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Not for loan | 22845-1001 |
Browsing Mindef Library & Info Centre shelves, Shelving location: Journals Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| NUCLEAR WEAPONS Seizing the moment: using the U.S.-Indian nuclear deal to improve fissile material security | NUCLEAR WEAPONS Is there a future for non-strategic nuclear weapons? / | NUCLEAR WEAPONS Parity in peril? : the continuing vitality of Russian-US strategic nuclear deterrence / | NUCLEAR WEAPONS Deterrence, blackmail, friendly persuasion / | NUCLEAR WEAPONS A different path to nuclear arms reduction / | NUCLEAR WEAPONS The future of the U.S. nuclear deterrent / | NUCLEAR WEAPONS India's emerging missile capability : the science and politics of Agni-III / |
Considers the concept of deterrence (which has its roots in the Latin verb deterrere meaning to frighten) with particular reference to nuclear weapons. Looks at such matters as who can have nuclear weapons, the risks posed by rogue states, minimising the risk, and the possibility of developing some form of collective deterrence.
There are no comments on this title.
Log in to your account to post a comment.