Regular and irregular indigenous forces for a long irregular war / Robert M Cassidy
Material type:
TextPublication details: 2007Subject(s):
In:
RUSI Journal Vol 152 No1, February 2007, pp.42-47Summary: The "long war" is how the USA describes what it used (before 2005) to call the global war on terror. American security doctrine and practice is now focussing on the benefits of using indigenous personnel in counterinsurgency forces. Briefly describes some historical precedents that indicate the effectiveness of this approach.
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal Article | Mindef Library & Info Centre Journals | COUNTERINSURGENCY (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Not for loan | 21836-1001 |
Browsing Mindef Library & Info Centre shelves, Shelving location: Journals Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| COUNTER TERRORISM Counter-terrorism training/ | COUNTERINSURGENCY Counter-insurgency redux / | COUNTERINSURGENCY Countering insurgent-terrorism : why NATO chose the wrong historical foundation for CIMIC / | COUNTERINSURGENCY Regular and irregular indigenous forces for a long irregular war / | COUNTERINSURGENCY Consequence management during counterinsurgency operations / | COUNTERINSURGENCY What works, what doesn't : countering asymmetric 'weapons that wait' / | COUNTERINSURGENCY Hearts and minds,cultiral awareness and good intelligence: the blueprint for successful counter-insurgency?/ |
The "long war" is how the USA describes what it used (before 2005) to call the global war on terror. American security doctrine and practice is now focussing on the benefits of using indigenous personnel in counterinsurgency forces. Briefly describes some historical precedents that indicate the effectiveness of this approach.
There are no comments on this title.
Log in to your account to post a comment.