Strategic regionalism in East Asia / Julie Gilson

By: Material type: TextTextPublication details: 2007Subject(s): In: Review of International Studies Vol 33 No 1, January 2007, pp.145-163 (45)Summary: The United States, China and Japan are often portrayed as dominating East Asia and being in a condition of perpetual potential conflict. This paper suggests that this is not necessarily the case; instead East Asia now has increased significance as a region per se in the foreign policy agendas of the three powers and enabling a form of regional joint leadership. ASEAN, it is said, has important roles in acting as a balancer of trilateral activity, through its interconnectedness, and in providing a basis of normative values.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

The United States, China and Japan are often portrayed as dominating East Asia and being in a condition of perpetual potential conflict. This paper suggests that this is not necessarily the case; instead East Asia now has increased significance as a region per se in the foreign policy agendas of the three powers and enabling a form of regional joint leadership. ASEAN, it is said, has important roles in acting as a balancer of trilateral activity, through its interconnectedness, and in providing a basis of normative values.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.