Strategic regionalism in East Asia / Julie Gilson
Material type: TextPublication details: 2007Subject(s): In: Review of International Studies Vol 33 No 1, January 2007, pp.145-163 (45)Summary: The United States, China and Japan are often portrayed as dominating East Asia and being in a condition of perpetual potential conflict. This paper suggests that this is not necessarily the case; instead East Asia now has increased significance as a region per se in the foreign policy agendas of the three powers and enabling a form of regional joint leadership. ASEAN, it is said, has important roles in acting as a balancer of trilateral activity, through its interconnectedness, and in providing a basis of normative values.Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Article | Mindef Library & Info Centre Journals | EAST ASIA (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Not for loan | 21809-1001 |
Browsing Mindef Library & Info Centre shelves, Shelving location: Journals Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
The United States, China and Japan are often portrayed as dominating East Asia and being in a condition of perpetual potential conflict. This paper suggests that this is not necessarily the case; instead East Asia now has increased significance as a region per se in the foreign policy agendas of the three powers and enabling a form of regional joint leadership. ASEAN, it is said, has important roles in acting as a balancer of trilateral activity, through its interconnectedness, and in providing a basis of normative values.
There are no comments on this title.