Japan's changing conception of the ASEAN regional forum: from an optimistic liberal to a pessimistic realist perspective

By: Material type: TextTextPublication details: 2005Subject(s): In: The Pacific Review Vol 18 No 4 December 2005, pp.463-497Summary: This article explores changes in Japan's conception of and policy toward security multilateralism in the Asia-Pacific regional after the end of the Cold War with special reference to the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF). It makes the observation that notwithstanding Japan's active role behind the establishment of the ARF in the early 1990s and continuing public expression of strong support for Asia-Pacific security multilateralism since that time, in actualitym Japan's enthusiasm for it has dwindled from the late 1990s onwards. This article also argues that this has been due primarily to Japan's disappointing experiences in the ARF, evinced by its abortive efforts to promote meaningful cooperative security measures and the failings if multilateral security diplomacy in addressing its security concerns.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode
Journal Article Mindef Library & Info Centre Journals XX(19454.1) (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Not for loan 19454-1001

This article explores changes in Japan's conception of and policy toward security multilateralism in the Asia-Pacific regional after the end of the Cold War with special reference to the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF). It makes the observation that notwithstanding Japan's active role behind the establishment of the ARF in the early 1990s and continuing public expression of strong support for Asia-Pacific security multilateralism since that time, in actualitym Japan's enthusiasm for it has dwindled from the late 1990s onwards. This article also argues that this has been due primarily to Japan's disappointing experiences in the ARF, evinced by its abortive efforts to promote meaningful cooperative security measures and the failings if multilateral security diplomacy in addressing its security concerns.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.