Soft balancing in the age of U.S. primacy: T V Paul
Material type:
TextPublication details: 2005Subject(s):
In:
International Security Vol. 30, No 1, Summer 2005, pp.46-71 (68)Summary: It has been argued that the balance of power theory has become irrelevant to understanding state behaviour in the post-Cold War world. This article suggests this is not the case and identifies examples (Kosovo, Iraq War) of soft-balancing strategies by states intended to constrain the power and threatening behaviour of the United States.
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal Article | Mindef Library & Info Centre On-Shelf | XX(19133.1) (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Not for loan | 19133-1001 |
Browsing Mindef Library & Info Centre shelves, Shelving location: On-Shelf Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
It has been argued that the balance of power theory has become irrelevant to understanding state behaviour in the post-Cold War world. This article suggests this is not the case and identifies examples (Kosovo, Iraq War) of soft-balancing strategies by states intended to constrain the power and threatening behaviour of the United States.
There are no comments on this title.
Log in to your account to post a comment.