Simply another practice among others? analysing the rise of strategic partnerships in the Asia-Pacific region / Jack D. Butcher
Material type:
Item type | Current library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Article | Mindef Library & Info Centre Journals | STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not for loan |
Browsing Mindef Library & Info Centre shelves, Shelving location: Journals Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
STORM SHADOW CRUISE MISSILE Winter of discontent?/ | STRATEGIC CONCEPT What makes a good strategic concept?/ | STRATEGIC IMPORTANCE Indian ocean conference fosters conversations/ | STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP Simply another practice among others? analysing the rise of strategic partnerships in the Asia-Pacific region / | STRATEGIC PLANNING Defense and strategic planning challenges in an entirely new age/ | STRATEGIC PLANNING Lessons from d-day: the importance of combined and joint operations/ | STRATEGIC SHAPING AND RECONNAISSANCE Strategic shaping & reconnaissance/ |
Strategic partnerships (SPs) have grown exponentially over the last decade in the Asia-Pacific. However, little remains known in the international security studies (ISS) literature regarding why they have proliferated now and how to best understand what they mean for regional security. In this article, I argue that SPs are best understood as a new security practice in the Asia-Pacific that allows states and multilateral actors to flexibly manage threats, strategic challenges, and interests through cooperation and common norm building. To evidence this argument, I adopt a functional approach to SPs that draws upon the mainstream ISS theories of realism, liberalism and constructivism and synthesises them where possible to draw attention to a wide range of causal factors responsible for them. Analyses guided by eclecticism can provide an all-encompassing tool for explanatory and comparative studies on Asia-Pacific security to draw a broader range of conclusions than any one approach allows for.
There are no comments on this title.