Image from Google Jackets

Are indigenous conceptions of sovereignty as non-interference patriachal?/ Rauna Kuokkanen, Sheryl Lightfoot, Gina Starblanket, [et. al.]

By: Material type: TextTextPublication details: 2025Subject(s): In: Review of International Studies, January 2025, Volume 51 Issue 1, pg. 1-21Summary: This article discusses the concept of sovereignty in IR, particularly focusing on the principle of non-interference. It highlights how Catherine MacKinnon's feminist critique reveals non-interference can perpetuate patriarchal power structures by ignoring gendered power imbalances, silencing marginalised voices, and prioritising non-interference over relationality. It concludes with a discussion of the relationship between consent, non-interference and non-domination.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Status Date due Barcode
Journal Article Mindef Library & Info Centre Journals WESTERN PATRIARCHAL IDEAS (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan

This article discusses the concept of sovereignty in IR, particularly focusing on the principle of non-interference. It highlights how Catherine MacKinnon's feminist critique reveals non-interference can perpetuate patriarchal power structures by ignoring gendered power imbalances, silencing marginalised voices, and prioritising non-interference over relationality. It concludes with a discussion of the relationship between consent, non-interference and non-domination.

SOVEREIGNTY, NON-INTERFERENCE, INDIGENOUS CONCEPTIONS, WESTERN PATRIARCHAL IDEAS, NEWARTICLS

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.